. . . to a lot of things, really, but right now, specifically, to this:
But what women really want from Michael Fassbender’s gigantic talent and terrific looks is a little less art house/indie, fewer robots/mutants/warriors, and more big, swoony, fabulous love stories. THE FUCK WE DO.
What I love about Michael Fassbender as an actor is PRECISELY that he is
in those indie films and plays robots and mutants and warriors. I want to watch those movies and I want to watch gigantic talent and terrific looks in them. For all that I poke fun, I admire Fassbender for taking the sinister, morally sketchy, kinky, thinky,
difficult roles. I admire anyone who sits with difficulty and acknowledges complexity, and especially someone who tries to translate the importance of those things to others.
AND WHO THINKS WOMEN ONLY WANT SWOONY LOVE STORIES?
Okay, so we read the swoony fanfic love stories. But they are swoony love stories based on
other stories, often stories that are dark and hurty or big and adventurous or decidedly not romantic (or, at least, not romantic between the characters we then assign romance to). I object to this stereotype. I object to the gendered use of the word "fabulous." I object to the idea of cramming Michael.Fucking.Fassbender. into a schmoopy romantic movie. (You guys,
Jane Eyre. Seriously. It wasn't actually good. And I still argue it's not the dreamy love story they want you to believe it is, and I object to that, too, because Rochester is a dick, but whatever.) It's base and annoying and INCORRECT to assert that girls want love stories instead of sword-and-sandal flicks or compelling sci-fi or art house dramas.
So I object. And I will
objectify what men I want to, in the media genres I want to, in the stories I find compelling. And
THEN I will read the fanfic about their falling into big, swoony, fabulous love stories and having imaginary hot, hot sex with each other. In that order. Get it right or pay the price,
Vogue.
crossposted to dreamwidth